AI GOVERNANCE EVIDENCE · B2B

Answer AI governance questions with evidence, not a last-minute policy scramble.

A human-reviewed evidence binder for one AI workflow: systems, vendors, data, oversight, evaluations, incidents, and approved answers organized for customer and insurer diligence.

Currently: research preview · synthetic data · no customer claims

RESEARCH PREVIEWSYNTHETIC

Synthetic AI evidence binder

AI workflow inventorySupport summarizationDOCUMENTED
Human review gateBefore customer sendEVIDENCED
Evaluation recordOwner not assignedOPEN
Decision support, not a decision.

01 / THE TRIGGER

A customer, insurer, procurement team, or board asks how a company uses AI, what data it touches, who reviews outputs, and what evidence supports the answers.

Small B2B companies pull inconsistent answers from product, legal, security, and engineering, then write policies that may not match the workflow actually deployed.

02 / SAMPLE OUTPUT

A useful answer before a sales form.

This preview shows the shape of the output with synthetic inputs. Nothing here is personalized advice or production evidence.

RESEARCH PREVIEWSYNTHETIC

Synthetic AI evidence binder

AI workflow inventorySupport summarizationDOCUMENTED
Human review gateBefore customer sendEVIDENCED
Evaluation recordOwner not assignedOPEN
Decision support, not a decision.

03 / HOW A PILOT WORKS

01

Map the workflow

Document the trigger, current workaround, inputs, and acceptance criteria.

02

Test a narrow output

Use synthetic or explicitly approved sample data in a scoped report.

03

Decide with evidence

Continue only if the workflow helps and a buyer makes a commercial commitment.

04 / FIT

Built for a narrow buyer.

Worth a conversation if you are…

B2B SaaS companies receiving AI diligence questions

AI consultancies that need customer-ready governance evidence

Agencies using AI with customer or employee information

Not the right fit for…

Legal opinions or regulatory certification

Invented policies unsupported by operating evidence

Restricted or confidential uploads through the public form

05 / FOUNDING OFFER

A founding evidence-binder engagement for one AI workflow: inventory, vendor and data map, human-review controls, evaluation register, missing-evidence list, and reusable diligence answers.

COMMERCIAL HYPOTHESIS

$1,000 founding-binder hypothesisTwo-week scoped engagementDiscuss the scope

06 / WHAT IS TRUE TODAY

EvidenceKit AI is a validation-stage documentation service, not legal advice, certification, or proof of regulatory compliance.

The public form accepts no policies, contracts, customer names, model logs, credentials, personal data, or confidential documents.

Final claims remain subject to customer review and appropriate legal, privacy, security, or compliance approval.

07 / STRAIGHT ANSWERS

Questions this test must answer.

Will you write policies we do not currently follow?+

No. The binder should describe the reviewed workflow and clearly flag missing controls or evidence.

Does this make us compliant with the EU AI Act or another framework?+

No. It organizes operational evidence and gaps; applicability and legal conclusions require qualified counsel.

What is included in one workflow?+

One defined AI-enabled process, its vendors and data categories, human-review points, evaluations, incidents, owners, and supporting evidence references.

08 / YOUR SIGNAL

Choose the commitment that matches your intent.

We use these details to separate useful buyer evidence from general curiosity.

No mailing list. No invented urgency. Your response is used only for this experiment.